1.
Test Results
At 300v, the WE, Shuguang and Vaic were very close together, and sounded quite similar
also (except for greater bass "tubbiness" in the Shuguang). The Svetlanas were
not tested at 300v, as this is very low voltage for them and they, being modified
transmitting tubes, prefer more voltage and current. Note that the old globe 50s were
mediocre by comparison; their readings were about what a good 2A3 would give. These tubes are beginning to really wake up at 500v 50 mA. This is a
reasonable dissipation for 300Bs, and it is just tickling the Vaic and Svetlana tubes.
Note that they were quite close together, except for the Cetron which was very poor
throughout. In such tests, due to the small samples (only a single tube in the case of the
Shuguang), a difference of 0.05% is not really significant. Since the Vaic and Svetlana
types can be run harder than 300Bs, (and they definitely sound better when this is done),
they should be run harder in order to take advantage of their greater dissipation
capacity. The 50s were not tested at 500v as they are rated for 450v maximum. The 500v 75
mA test was at the outer limits for conventional 300Bs. In fact, the fellow who loaned the
WEs for the test would NOT allow them to be run that hard. He worried that they might be
destroyed, and he might be correct. And since these things are selling USED for $200-$300
each on the street, we decided to let it lie. But the Shuguang 300B was able to tolerate
the power for a quick test (this was at the verge of redness on the plate). The SV811s and
VV30Bs cheerfully absorbed it and begged for more. In fact, I ran 120 mA into an SV811-10
and a VV30B at 500v; no problem, no color was observed on the plates, and distortion was
around 0.10% for both. We were unable to test the Cetrons at 75 mA.
Note that the load impedance used for testing all of these tubes was
3200 ohms. This was conservative for the 300Bs, but rather low for the SV811s. Even so,
the SV811s gave distortion figures on a par with the best 300Bs, indicating that SV811s
are more load-tolerant than most receiving power triodes.
Final conclusions:
1. The VV30B is an excellent tube, recommended for either 300B retrofit or for
higher-power operation.
2. The SV811 is also excellent, though it is not compatible with existing amplifiers. It
should be a serious contender for OEM and hobbyist use.
3. The Shuguang 300B is surprisingly good quality, but it obviously has limits on
dissipation. It seems to use materials similar to other Shuguang tubes, so lifetime is
expected to be less than that of the other brands.
4. Richardson has got problems: the first Cetron 300B we got developed a filament-to-grid
short upon plugging into the amp. Even with 4.0vDC on the filament, it still shorted out.
THIS IS SERIOUS TROUBLE. The second sample worked, but its filament was splayed out rather
than staying in a flat plane; thus, performance was the worst of the lot, as was the
sound. Its materials appear good, but quality control is very poor. Two good-used 1994
samples we borrowed worked OK, so maybe a bad 1995 lot was involved.
We are presently negotiating with Westrex for samples of the new
production WE 300B; delivery date unknown. And the same is being done with New Sensor for
samples of the recently-announced Sovtek 300B.
Excerpts from original article in Winter 1996 Vacuum Tube Valley
Magazine. This back issue is available - see home page.